> 新闻 > 国内新闻 > 正文

怪谈

SC delivers split verdict in Hijab case_我的网站

上门女婿

A |     

新华社北京7月31日电(记者王楚捷)2022年国际摔跤A级赛罗马尼亚站31日迎来收官日,中国队在男子自由式摔跤97公斤级、125公斤级和男子古典式摔跤130公斤级比赛中斩获金牌,当日共取得3金1银1铜。

B |     New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.

The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.

"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.

While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."

The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.

The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.

The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.

The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.

The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.

A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.

The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.

The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.

UNI SM ING。

C | 男子自由式摔跤97公斤级决赛,中国队木黑特·吐尔逊别克10:1战胜欧锦赛银牌得主、瑞士选手塞缪尔·舍勒,获得冠军;老将邓志伟以6:0力克亚锦赛金牌得主、哈萨克斯坦选手约瑟夫·巴特尔穆尔扎耶夫,斩获男子自由式摔跤125公斤级冠军。男子古典式摔跤方面,孟令哲在130公斤级循环赛中收获冠军,王成武获82公斤级银牌,李一鸣获97公斤级铜牌。

中国队最终以8金4银5铜的成绩圆满结束罗马尼亚站的比赛,中国女子自由式摔跤队获团体积分总冠军,中国男子自由式摔跤队、男子古典式摔跤队均位居团体积分第二名。本站比赛结束后,国家女子摔跤队、男子摔跤队将启程分别前往德国和阿塞拜疆,参加为期一个月的国际摔跤训练营。9月初,队伍将在塞尔维亚集合,进行世锦赛前的最后备战。

Current article:http://x7kc.nenyaogecebenliexi.shop/4eumzx/20260826/7882.html

Published on:10:15:45